Legal Opinion

Coppin v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided September 23, 2009No. Nos. 3921-08, 7032-08Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

ARTHUR BRUCE AND LINDA LEE COPPIN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Coppin v. Comm'r

Nos. 3921-08, 7032-08 1

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2009-221; 2009 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 223; 98 T.C.M. (CCH) 277;

September 23, 2009, Filed

Arthur Bruce and Linda Lee Coppin, Pro sese.

J. Robert Cuatto, for respondent.

Halpern, James S.

JAMES S. HALPERN

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

HALPERN, Judge: By notices of deficiency, respondent determined deficiencies of $ 2,411 and $ 2,385 in petitioners' Federal income tax for taxable (calendar) years 2004 and 2005. The deficiencies for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mendes v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2003
  2. Sutter v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
  3. Hynes v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  4. Lee E. Coombs and Judy B. Coombs v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, James C. Cox v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. Coombs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API