Legal Opinion

Breeden v. Lybrand

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 22, 2006No. 2004-CA-1340PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROLAND L. BELSOME, Judge.

| Appellants, Ronald and Eloyease Lyb-rand (“the Lybrands”), appeal the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees to Appel-lee, Patrick Breeden (“Mr.Breeden”), for work he performed in defending the Lyb-rands’ property from foreclosure. Mr. Breeden cross-appeals the trial court’s failure to award attorney’s fees on his open account litigation.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Mr. Breeden filed suit to recover attorney’s fees that he claimed the Lybrands owed him for legal work done in defending the Lybrands’ property from foreclosure. The Lybrands claimed that they never hired Mr.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Barrilleaux v. Franklin Foundation Hosp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Kirkpatrick v. YoungSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  5. Keaty v. RaspantiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moses v. MosesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Titus v. WilsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Banks v. Kottemann Law FirmDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API