Legal Opinion

RLI Insurance v. Hanover Insurance

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 12, 1997No. 95-P-495PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

1. The facts. In ruling on the cross motions for summary judgment, the Superior Court judge had before him various materials, including Hanover’s *830policy and affidavits from Matthew and his father. The “regular use” coverage exclusion clause of the policy provides that Hanover will not pay “[f]or injuries resulting from an accident while you or a household member is using an auto which you or any household member owns or uses regularly, unless a premium for this Part is shown for that auto on the Coverage Selections Page” (emphasis in original). The only automobiles listed on the coverage…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brien Volpe v. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  2. Galvin v. Amica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  3. Turner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Safety Insurance v. DayMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API