Legal Opinion

Herzig v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 17, 1968No. 1084PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNS, PAUL D., Associate Judge.

After an adverse jury verdict at trial upon an Information charging the defendant with robbery, defendant appealed from the judgment and sentence. We affirm.

The defendant represented by the Public Defender made no motion for a new trial and on this appeal has failed and neglected to state in his brief the assignments of error relied on for reversal. Appellate Rule 3.7(f) (4), 32 F.S.A. requires that, “Specific assignments of error from which the points argued arise should be stated.” Apparently, the Public Defenders do not know of this Rule, although they…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fulton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Reaves v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  3. Fulton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  4. Fulton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API