Senter v. Monroe
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
The complaint in this action avers, in substance, that the defendant represented to plaintiffs that E. F. Spence, J. F. Crank, and John D. Bicknell were the owners of certain real estate in the county of *348Los Angeles, specifically describing it, and that he, defendant, was the agent of said parties, with full power to bargain, sell, and convey the same; that plaintiffs, relying upon said representations, bought from him said lands for the sum of $250, and then paid him on said purchase the sum of $62.50, and took from, him his written obligation, as follows:—
“This is to witness, that I have…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wallace v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Lander v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by7 opinions
- Melone v. RuffinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Tedder v. RigginSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
- Pruitt v. FontanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Van Buskirk v. McClenahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Borton v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.