Legal Opinion

Hegeman v. Cantrell

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided December 15, 1875Published

On settlement of proposed case.

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.

— This action was brought in equity for the foreclosure of a mortgage executed by the defendant to the plaintiff. The defendant interposed the defense of usury, and on her motion issues relating to such defense were framed and directed to be tried by the jury.

From the affidavit of the plaintiff’s attorney, which was not controverted by the defendant the following facts appear :

The trial of the issues took place at the March trial term, and the verdict was rendered March 18th, 1875.

*189Defendant’s time to make and serve a case to review that trial on a case, expired on the 28th of March, 1875.

A…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vermilyea v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Birdsall v. . PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Hatch v. PeugnetNew York Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Snell v. LoucksNew York Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Brown v. CliffordNew York Supreme Court · 1872

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API