Sekeres v. Arbaugh
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentHerbert R. Brown, J.
I respectfully dissent because I believe that the majority should address (but does not) an issue that causes a substantial chill on the requirement of Section 16, Article I of the Ohio Constitution that the courts of Ohio be open to every person for the administration of justice without denial or delay.
In this case, Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., a corporation of worldwide dimension, has provided in its pre-printed customer *29agreement that if the customer makes a claim against the corporation, the customer shall pay “any cost incurred by Merrill, Lynch in successfully defending…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Schulke Radio Productions, Ltd. v. Midwestern Broadcasting Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Elias Siegelman, Individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of Eva Siegelman, Deceased v. Cunard White Star LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Motorists Mutual Insurance v. TrainorOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Wheeler v. St. Joseph HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Standard Oil Company of California v. Clyde A. PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.