Legal Opinion

Cun-En Lin v. Holy Family Monuments

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Herbert Kramer, J.

Plaintiff Lin, who was sitting on the platform of a gantry crane while reinforcing its support rods] was injured when the crane collapsed, causing him to fall to the ground. Defendant moves to dismiss plaintiffs claims under sections 200/240 (1) *619and 241 (6) of the Labor Law claiming that plaintiff has failed to make out a prima facie case under any of these provisions. Plaintiff cross-moves for summary judgment on the section 240 (1) claim and moves for consolidation of the instant action with a related action under index number 32871/03.

With respect to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Struble v. John Arborio, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Gonzalez v. United Parcel ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Clute v. Ellis HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Wong v. New York Times Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Mascellino v. Buffalo General HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cun-En Lin v. Holy Family MonumentsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Cun-En Lin v. Holy Family MonumentsNew York Supreme Court, Kings County · 2004
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API