Legal Opinion

United States v. Ochoa-Oregel

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 2, 2018No. 16-50413PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Before: Ronald M. Gould and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges, and Dana L. Christensen,* Chief District Judge.

ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION

The opinion filed on August 2, 2018 and published at 898 F.3d 948 is AMENDEDas follows.

*684The second sentence of the third paragraph states:

As Ochoa's removal proceeding was in absentia, he has satisfied the exhaustion and deprivation of judicial review requirements.

That sentence is deleted and replaced with the following language:

Ochoa was ordered removed in absentia in 2008, but did not receive notice of either his in absentia removal hearing or of his ability to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam v. UsdhsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Martinez-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Jose Gambino-RuizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  4. United States v. Juan Bastide-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  5. United States v. Juan Bastide-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API