United States v. Ochoa-Oregel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Before: Ronald M. Gould and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges, and Dana L. Christensen,* Chief District Judge.
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
The opinion filed on August 2, 2018 and published at 898 F.3d 948 is AMENDEDas follows.
*684The second sentence of the third paragraph states:
As Ochoa's removal proceeding was in absentia, he has satisfied the exhaustion and deprivation of judicial review requirements.
That sentence is deleted and replaced with the following language:
Ochoa was ordered removed in absentia in 2008, but did not receive notice of either his in absentia removal hearing or of his ability to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam v. UsdhsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Martinez-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Jose Gambino-RuizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- United States v. Juan Bastide-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Juan Bastide-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.