Tsigutkin v. Scanlan

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol E. Huff, J.), entered March 6, 1992, which, inter alia, denied the defendants’ motion for a protective order with respect to Item 18 of the plaintiff’s Notice to Produce, unanimously reversed, insofar as appealed, on the law, and the motion for a protective order with respect to Item 18 is granted, with costs.

In each of the causes of action asserted by the plaintiff, he demanded, inter alia, an accounting of all monies earned by the corporate defendant since his association with the corporation was terminated, and of all profits derived from the…