Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Township of Royal Oak

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1939No. Docket No. 113, Calendar No. 40,391PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, C. J.

A stipulation of facts filed herein recites that plaintiff and three companions were riding in an automobile on May 8, 1935, in the township of Royal Oak. They were unfamiliar with the surrounding country as well as Palmer boulevard, a street located in “Symphony Park subdivision,” onto which they turned from the Eleven-Mile road. There were no barricades or signs at the juncture of the two streets that indicated Palmer boulevard was closed to public travel or that there was a break in the road. Defendant does not claim any negligence on the part of the driver when the automobile was driven…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. County of Wayne v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Western Springs Park District v. LawrenceIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Hoerrmann v. Wabash Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Chapman v. City of Sault Ste. MarieMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Wallner v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eyde Bros. Development Co. v. Roscommon County Board of Road CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Rindone v. Corey Community ChurchMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Vivian v. Roscommon County Board of Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Thummel v. Kansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  5. Vivian v. Roscommon County Board of Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API