Legal Opinion

State v. Parker

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 4, 1998No. 89469PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We have before us the State’s appeal of the trial court’s order granting J.B. Parker’s posteonviction request for a new penalty phase proceeding. We also have before us Parker’s cross-appeal of the trial court’s order denying his posteonviction request for a new trial. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

In this ease, the trial court granted relief as to a new penalty phase after finding that the State withheld exculpatory evidence that could have changed, within a reasonable probability, the outcome of Parker’s sentence. The trial court denied relief as to a new trial after…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Green v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  3. Lightbourne v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  4. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  5. STATE OF FLORIDA v. J.B. PARKERDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API