Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hicks

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 2014PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice EAKIN.

In this appeal, we consider Pa.R.E. 403 and 404(b). The trial court ruled pre-trial that certain Commonwealth witnesses identified pursuant to Rule 404 would be cumulative, rendering their testimony inadmissible under Rule 403. We conclude this was error, reverse the Superior Court’s order, and remand to the trial court.

On January 29, 2008, the dismembered body of Deanna Null was discovered in seven garbage bags strewn along Pennsylvania Routes 80 and 380. After receiving information that Null was last seen riding with appellee Hicks, police interviewed him; he admitted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Sprint/United Management Co. v. MendelsohnSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Pocono Manor Investors, LP v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Hicks, C., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Castellani, R., Aplts. v. Scranton TimesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Commonwealth v. SauersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. N. Desher (Guardian ad litem of P. Devlin) v. SEPTACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Commonwealth v. CrearySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API