Rawls v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Judge.
This is a conviction for drunken driving, with punishment assessed at a fine of $100 and seven days in jail.
The sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction is challenged.
In Threet v. State, 157 Texas Cr. Rep. 497, 250 S.W. 2d 200, we held that an extrajudicial confession, alone, would not authorize a conviction for drunken driving. In reaching that conclusion, we said:
“Outside of appellant’s confession, we have only a turned-over or wrecked pick-up on the highway to establish that he was the driver of the truck, that he owned the truck, or that he was seen at the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Threet v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Fancher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
3Cited by13 opinions
- Weaver v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- McCafferty v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
- Folk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.