Legal Opinion

Sauk County v. City of Baraboo

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

Plaintiff recovered judgment in this action for a balance claimed to be owing by the defendant city of Baraboo to plaintiff on account of the construction by plaintiff of a bridge on a state trunk highway within the defendant city. The construction of the bridge, which, at the formal request of the common council of the city, exceeded in width the standard prescribed for bridges by the county board of Sauk county, was. undertaken and completed by the county, in connection with the reconstruction of the highway, under the provisions of chs. 83 and 87, Stats. 1923. After the bridge was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Northern Trust Co. v. SnyderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  2. State v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Sullivan v. School District No. 1 of the City of TomahWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  4. State v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Joyce v. Sauk CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Madison v. Frank Lloyd Wright FoundationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Hasslinger v. Village of HartlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Schwartz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Foreway Express, Inc. v. City of HilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Bartens v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API