Legal Opinion

RUTHERFORD, MULHALL & WARGO v. Antidormi

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 25, 1997No. 97-1143PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

695 So.2d 1300 (1997)

RUTHERFORD, MULHALL & WARGO, P.A., Petitioner,

v.

Allen ANTIDORMI, Respondent.

No. 97-1143.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 25, 1997.

John T. Mulhall III and Nicole Caruso Seropian of Rutherford, Mulhall & Wargo, P.A., Boca Raton, pro se.

Andrew K. Fein of Bloch & Minerley, P.L., Boca Raton, for respondent.

2Per curiam

The law firm of Rutherford, Mulhall & Wargo, P.A. imposed a retaining lien on its office file for a former client who disputed the fee charged. The firm seeks common law certiorari review of an order that requires it to turn over the file to the…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Andrew Hall and Associates v. GhanemDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Wintter v. FabberDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fingar v. Braun and May Realty, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Shelowitz, Shelowitz, Terrell & Coffey, P.A. v. PetersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. Alessi Family Ltd. Partnership v. Centurion Development, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API