Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States ex rel. Sutton v. Mulcahy

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 30, 1948No. 264, Docket 20975Published

1ConcurrenceClark, Circuit Judge

With not a few doubts about this tangled case, unfortunately not clarified by the record, I have finally come to the conclusion that Judge Swan states the proper result now to be reached on the authorities by an intermediate court and that further exposition of the law, if necessary, must come from the Supreme Court. My doubts center about the fact that if the 1940 amendment to 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(1) is invalid,1 there would appear to be a lack of subject matter jurisdiction over the original action leading to the relator’s imprisonment until the heavy fine imposed is paid. For the ground taken…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Maggio v. ZeitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Mitchell v. MaurerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Raphael v. TraskSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Goldman v. Staten Island Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API