Legal Opinion

Sherburne v. Shepard

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 30, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Morton, O. J.

This is scire facias against the indorser of a writ. The only defence now relied upon is, that the plaintiff in this suit, in taxing his costs in the original action, in which he was the defendant, fraudulently procured the allowance by the clerk of various sums to which he was not lawfully entitled. We are of opinion that this defence is not open to the defendant, but that the judgment in the original action, so long as it is unreversed, is conclusive upon him.

The statute provides that “ every indorser, in case of avoidance or inability of the plaintiff, shall be liable to pay…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tracy v. MaloneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Wood v. MannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Savage v. BlanchardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  2. Calhoun v. GrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Pullman's Palace-Car Co. v. WashburnU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1895
  4. Bird v. JohnstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API