Havemeyer Sugar Refining Co. v. Taussig
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from orders made at a Special Term denying motions to discharge the defendants from arrest and the sureties from an undertaking given in their behalf. In the first ease a judgment had been entered; in the second it had not.
1Opinion of the Court
Daniels, J.:
The defendants were arrested in this action under an order of arrest and held to bail in the sum of $9,000, on the 11th of October, 1883. They were discharged upon giving an undertaking with sureties in the form prescribed by subdivision 3 of section 575 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The issue in the. action was tried and a verdict' recovered against the defendants and judgment entered upon it on the 24th of December, 1884, and in February, 1887, no execution having been issued upon the judgment, this application was made for the release of the defendants and the discharge of…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Weinus v. LightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Boeger v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Newgas v. SolomonNew York Supreme Court · 1888