Legal Opinion

Warner Holdings, Ltd. v. Abrego

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 22, 1985No. 84-295PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

This is the second appeal arising from a mortgage foreclosure case. Our jurisdiction is based on Ark. Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Rule 29. 1. j. In the first appeal we held that, given the state of the law in 1974, when the mortgage was executed, the mortgagor, United Peoples Federal Savings and Loan Association, could not enforce a “due on sale” clause against its mortgagee, Mary Ann Abrego, and those who had purchased the mortgaged property from her. Abrego v. United Peoples Federal Savings and Loan Association, 281 Ark. 308, 664 S.W.2d 858 (1984). Larry and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moose v. GregorySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Abrego v. United Peoples Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Green v. FergusonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  4. Southall v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Winburn Tile Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Damron v. University Estates, Phase II, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Gunderson Rail ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  4. Damron v. University Estates, Phase II, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API