City of Chicago v. Murphy
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
The question involved in this case is the validity of an ordinance of the city of Chicago known as an ordinance relating to retail beverage dealers. The first section defines retail beverage dealers to include any person, firm or corporation selling, offering for sale or keeping with the intention of selling at retail, either in bottles or other containers, for consumption on the premises, “any malted, cereal or vinous non-intoxicating beverages as defined by law, or any soft drinks, carbonated beverages, fruit juices, water, milk, buttermilk, chocolate, tea, bouillon or other beverages.” The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Kettering v. City of JacksonvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
- Bradford v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Monroe v. City of LawrenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
- Potson v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Owens v. GreenIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
- Dean Milk Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
- Barnard & Miller v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Illinois Power & Light Corp. v. City of Centralia, Ill.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1935
- Village of Kincaid v. VecchiIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.