Granada Lakes Villas Condominium Ass'n v. Metro-Dade Investments Co.
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
Granada Lakes Villas Condominium Association (“Granada”) argues that the Second District Court of Appeal in Metro-Dade Investments, Co. v. Granada Lakes Villas Condominium, Inc., 74 So.3d 593 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011), erred because sections 617.1432, 718.117, and 718.1124, Florida Statutes (2010), restrict a trial court’s inherent, equitable authority to appoint a receiver in an action involving a condominium association.1 For the reasons expressed below, we approve the Second District’s holding that these statutes do not restrict a trial court’s equitable authority to appoint a receiver.
I. FACTS
Met…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- SOUTHERN BAPTIST HOSP. OF FLORIDA v. WelkerSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Apalachicola Northern Railroad Co. v. SommersSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- Edenfield v. CrispDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Lehman v. Trust Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
- Buckley Towers Condominium, Inc. v. BuchwaldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- VERONICA ROSS-WILLIAMS, etc. v. LINDA LEALI, RECEIVERDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022