Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. DeLeon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 23, 2011No. 0803173; A142932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

SAIF seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that claimant is entitled to insurer-paid attorney fees under ORS 656.382(2) for services provided at the hearing level, even though claimant did not prevail at that level, because claimant should have prevailed at that level. We agree with SAIF that ORS 656.382(2), as interpreted by this court in Santos v. Caryall Transport, 171 Or App 467, 469, 17 P3d 509 (2000), rev den, 332 Or 558 (2001) (Santos II), and SAIF v. Santos, 194 Or App 289, 293, 94 P3d 906 (2004) (Santos III), does not authorize an insurer-paid attorney…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Santos v. Caryall TransportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. SAIF Corp. v. SantosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. DeLeonOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  2. SAIF Corp. v. HaleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. In the Matter of PrestonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. SAIF Corp. v. PrestonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API