Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Stevens

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 30, 1997No. 10-92-10418; CA A85716Published

1DissentWarren, P. J.

In this appeal from a month-long trial, I dissent because the majority reverses the trial court on claimed errors that were not properly preserved for our review and did not work to defendant’s prejudice.

*608The state introduced expert testimony regarding BWS for the purposes of explaining the dynamics of Ram-beck’s relationship with defendant. It was defendant’s theory of the case that Rambeck abused and murdered her own child. The state offered evidence that Rambeck had been physically and emotionally abused by defendant. It then offered the testimony of Professor Klingbeil to explain why…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. HickmannOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. ShaferOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API