Wight v. Gardner
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker
It is conceded that, by the terms of the contract, appellants had the balance of the year 1871 to exercise the option to deliver the grain; and they claim that they exercised the option on the 24th of October, and on that day tendered 10,000 bushels of wheat, of the grade and in full compliance with the terms of the agreement. The tender claimed to have been made was with warehouse receipts for the quantity and quality of wheat in store as called for by the contract. Appellee failed to receive the grain, and claims the offer or tender then made left the contract open as before, and appellants…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Loeb v. SternIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- Orvis v. WaiteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
- Loeb v. SternAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902