Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hemingway

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 2011No. 1186 WDA 2009, 1187 WDA 2009, 1188 WDA 2009, 1189 WDA 2009, 1190 WDA 2009PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

DONOHUE, J.:

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas, Clearfield County, precluding 34 of the Commonwealth’s witnesses from testifying at the trial of defendants Maha-raji Hemingway, Michael Charles Gear-hart, Michael Clair Styers, Charles R. Gearhart, and Kenneth Vernon Smeal, as a result of the Commonwealth’s failure to provide the defendants with transcripts of the witnesses’ grand jury testimony in accordance with an agreement reached on February 27, 2009. We reverse and remand.

On December 20, 2006, at the request of the Attorney…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. BoczkowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Commonwealth v. BurkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Pirillo v. PirilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RolesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Com. v. Fantauzzi, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  3. Commonwealth v. SabulaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. HemingwaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Com. v. Barksdale, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API