Legal Opinion

Verdi v. Price

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 4, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

Equitable jurisdiction over suits for the recovery of the amount due on lost bonds and other sealed instruments was originally grounded in the utter lack of a remedy at law, since profert of the instrument was requisite in an action at law thereon, and also in the faculty of equity to decree the provision of indemnity against loss to the defendant. And no action was maintainable at law upon a lost unsealed instrument, whether negotiable or nonnegotiable. The need for such indemnity seems also to have been the ground for equitable interposition…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simmons Creek Coal Co. v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Lancy v. RandlettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
  3. Savannah National Bank v. HaskinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Santos v. First Nat'l State Bk. of NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  2. Flohr v. SnyderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  3. Hudson County National Bank v. SouthworthNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API