Phillips v. Hanse
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
SEARS, Chief Justice.
We granted certiorari in this case 1 to consider whether the Court of Appeals properly held that the appellee, Sean Hanse, was entitled to summary judgment on the ground of official immunity. Because we conclude that Hanse was involved in a discretionary act in engaging in a high-speed chase and did not act with actual malice in doing so, we conclude that the Court of Appeals did not err in ruling that Hanse was entitled to summary judgment.
1. County law enforcement officers such as Hanse are entitled to official or qualified “immunity for the negligent performance of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Cameron v. LangSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Merrow v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Adams v. HazelwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Logue v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Murphy v. BajjaniSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Randall Kevin Jones v. Officer S. FransenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Treneshia Dukes v. Nicholas DeatonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Roper v. GreenwaySupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- Selvy v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.