Legal Opinion
Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Southern Nevada Water Authority
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided June 7, 1999No. 30535PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This suit arises from respondent Southern Nevada Water Authority’s (Water Authority) adoption of a project labor agreement (PLA). Appellant American Asphalt bid on a Water Authority project, noting that it would not comply with the PLA, and its bid was rejected. Thereafter, appellants Associated Builders and Contractors and American Asphalt, along with two individual American Asphalt employees, filed a suit in district court. The district court upheld the validity of the PLA. This appeal followed.
FACTS
In 1993, the United States Supreme Court held that federal law would not pre-empt a…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Building & Construction Trades Council of the Metropolitan District v. Associated Builders & Contractors of Massachusetts/Rhode Island, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- George Harms Construction Co. v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Terminal Construction Corp. v. Atlantic County Sewerage AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- New York State Chapter, Inc. v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- State Industrial Insurance System v. United Exposition Services Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. San Francisco Airports CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- John T. Callahan & Sons, Inc. v. City of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- United States v. State EngineerNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- A. Pickett Construction, Inc. v. Luzerne County Convention Center AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Master Builders of Iowa, Inc. v. Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.