Legal Opinion
State v. Jackson
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 25, 2004No. 25367PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAHMEYER, Chief Judge.
James Jackson (Appellant) appeals his conviction for two misdemeanor violations of Section 304.010 1 that resulted in a sentence requiring him to pay $67.50 in fines and court costs. 2 We dismiss the appeal for failure to comply with Rule 84.04. 3
Though he was represented by counsel at trial, Appellant appears in this appeal pro se. 4 “Pro se parties are bound by the same rules of procedure as parties represented by lawyers, and are not entitled to indulgences they would not have received if represented by counsel.” Belisle v. City of Senath, 974 S.W.2d 600, 601 (Mo.App.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Nixon v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- Sutton v. GoldenbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Robin Farms, Inc. v. BartholomeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Kline v. Casey's General Stores, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Faith Baptist Church of Berkeley, Inc. v. HeffnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State of Missouri v. Rufus LittleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. MasseyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005