Legal Opinion

Patterson Water Co. v. Mifflin Borough

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1918No. Appeal, No. 38PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 38, March T., 1918, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Juniata Co.,' Feb. T., 1917, No. 24, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Patterson Water Company v. Mifflin Borough. Assumpsit for water rental.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 38, March T., 1918, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Juniata Co.,' Feb. T., 1917, No. 24, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Patterson Water Company v. Mifflin Borough. Assumpsit for water rental. Seibert, P. J., filed the following opinion: The plaintiff, the Patterson Water Co., a corporation of this Commonwealth, having its main office in the Borough of Mifflin (formerly Patterson), Juniata County, Pa., began furnishing water to the defendant, Mifflin Borough, in the said County of Juniata, for municipal fire extinguishing purposes, in the year 1892; under a contract for a…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This case was carefully tried by able counsel before a judge and jury; after careful review, on the motion for a new trial the judgment was directed to be entered on the verdict. For the reasons given by the learned trial judge the judgment is affirmed.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lenox Coal Co. v. Duncan-Spangler Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Royal Indemnity Company v. City of ErieDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API