Legal Opinion

United States v. Specialty House, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 21, 1955No. 4817PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCole, Judge

This is an appeal by the Government from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, Second Division, C. D. 1596, which sustained the -importers’ claim that merchandise invoiced as silk habutae squares, of various solid colors, prints, and ombre shades, used as color and style accessories to complement the feminine costume, was classifiable under paragraph 1210 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, infra, as silk wearing apparel, not specially provided for, dutiable at 35 per centum ad valorem.

The United States, as appellant, contends that the imported articles were correctly…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baar & Beards, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  2. Barclay Clover, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  3. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  4. Pennsylvania Textile Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  5. Regal Accessories, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API