Heeren v. Remington
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 136, April T., 1911, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 4, Allegheny Co., First Term, 1911, No. 262, setting aside judgment in case of Otto Heeren et al. v. E. P. Remington. Rule to set aside judgment. Before Cohen, J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was the order of the court setting aside the judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
By the terms of the lease from the plaintiffs to the defendant, the rent of 120,000 for the entire term of five years was payable in quarterly installments of $1,000 each, and in case of default in payment of any installment the whole of the unpaid rent for the entire term became due *438and payable. “That such a provision in a lease is enforced has been often decided. A tenant may agree, when entering into a lease, that the maturity of rent may be accelerated; the parties may agree that the whole rent for the term may be payable in advance or that it shall become payable at once on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Philadelphia v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Goodwin v. SharkeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
- Philadelphia v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Commonwealth v. MassiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Osterhout v. BriggsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
3Cited by4 opinions
- Baldwin v. American Motor Sales Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Moretti v. Zanfino Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Maricic v. Slesser, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1942
- Pestcoe v. Erlick, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1925