Legal Opinion

Seeley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 8, 1918No. 5018Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Judge.

The conviction is for abandonment after seduction and marriage as defined in article 1450, P. C.

A motion to quash the indictment was filed and overruled. It assailed the indictment upon the ground that it failed to designate the court in which, prior to the marriage, the prosecution was begun. The essential elements of the offense are a seduction, a marriage and an abandonment. The marriage must take place after prosecution has begun in a court of competent jurisdiction. This court, in the case of Kirkendall v. State, 78 Texas Crim. Rep., 168, passing upon the requisites of an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. Rudy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Kirkendall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API