Seeley v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Judge.
The conviction is for abandonment after seduction and marriage as defined in article 1450, P. C.
A motion to quash the indictment was filed and overruled. It assailed the indictment upon the ground that it failed to designate the court in which, prior to the marriage, the prosecution was begun. The essential elements of the offense are a seduction, a marriage and an abandonment. The marriage must take place after prosecution has begun in a court of competent jurisdiction. This court, in the case of Kirkendall v. State, 78 Texas Crim. Rep., 168, passing upon the requisites of an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Rudy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Kirkendall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915