Legal Opinion

Fenerty v. Culotta

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 7, 1955No. 42495PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMITER, Justice.

Norman Fenerty, in this action, seeks recovery for personal -injuries, property *651damages and expenses occasioned by an automobile collision wherein he and the defendant Marco Culotta were the drivers of the cars.

We granted certiorari to review that part of the judgment of the Orleans Court of Appeal which denied an award to plaintiff for damages sustained by his automobile and for towage charges, the court having held that plaintiff failed to prove the amount of such claimed damages and charges (he was allowed the sum of $1,764 for personal injuries and medical expenses). In…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hudgens v. MayeauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Chase v. DunbarLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Placid Oil Company v. AM Dupont CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  4. Le Blanc v. SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU CAS. INC. CO.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Thomas v. Paper Haulers, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API