Legal Opinion
Blair v. Rogers
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 28, 1939No. 27870PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBayless, C. J.
Myrtle Rogers, the widow of S. A. Rogers, deceased, recovered a judgment against M. P. Blair and Fairmont Creamery Company for the benefit of herself and daughter, as damages for the death of the said S. A. Rogers occasioned by the negligence of the defendants. The cause was tried in the district court of Oklahoma county, and the defendants have appealed.
There is one issue of law presented to us by the appealing parties which is paramount, and since we are deciding it in accordance with tlieir contention and are reversing the judgment, little else need be discussed.
About three days after the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Mulkey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- O'Brien v. BernoiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Railing v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
- East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad v. MaloySupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cummings v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Sanders v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Garza v. Delta Tau Delta Fraternity Nat.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- Fairmont Creamery Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941