Brodsky v. IHMS
New York Court of Common Pleas
Appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate an -order of arrest. This action was brought by John Brodsky against Anton Ihms. The nature of the action, and facts which appeared upon the motion, are fully stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.
The plaintiff claims to recover in this action about $90, due from the defendant, mostly from October1, 1860, *254for cooperage work, and materials furnished. On an affidavit, showing that defendant was about removing his property from this State to Alexandria, Virginia, with intent to defraud his creditors, an order of arrest was granted, which the defendant, on motion, sought to have vacated. It then appeared, however, that in addition to the conceded fact that the defendant had closed up his business in the city and opened a store in Alexandria, that he had a stock of goods on hand amounting…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Republic of Mexico v. de ArangoizThe Superior Court of New York City · 1856
- Courter v. McNamaraNew York Supreme Court · 1854