Legal Opinion

Francis v. Tucker

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 14, 1977PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sarah E. Francis, plaintiff below, appeals from an adverse decree in a boundary line dispute case between herself and Onnie E. and Barbara Lee Tucker, as coterminous land owners. We affirm.

The boundary line in question is the south line of the Tucker property and the north line of part of the Francis property, i.e., the boundary line that separates the back yards of these two neighbors. The controversy arose due to a 20-foot overlap in the legal descriptions of the two respective deeds.

Mrs. Francis, who acquired her lot through an aunt and who had been acquainted with the property for about…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baker v. Citizens Bank of GuntersvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. Guy v. LancasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  3. Wilson v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Edwards v. FarmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  5. Horn v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Robinson v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Ex Parte VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Sparks v. ByrdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Pinson v. VeachSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  5. Securitronics of America, Inc. v. Bruno's, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API