Legal Opinion

Sleeman v. Hotchkiss

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Nathaniel Sleeman against Lewis Hotchkiss and others. Plaintiff appeals from an order denying an application for leave to serve an amended complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtBrady, J.

The record discloses that this action was commenced in November, 1885; that the object was to cancel the written contract referred to, to compel the transfer of certain shares of stock, to procure an injunction, pendente lite, and to obtain the assessment of damages according to the rules and practice of the court, and for other and further relief. The original complaint was served in December, 1885. In 1886 an application was made upon the defendants’ answers, and upon the complaint and affidavits for an injunction, which was denied. The plaintiff thereupon served an amended complaint in…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zoller v. KelloggNew York Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Sleeman v. HotchkissNew York Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Stratton v. City Trust, Safe Deposit & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API