Legal Opinion
Herold v. Silston
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 17, 1952PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
The renewal note did not effect payment on the prior note, now sued upon, and the payee was, therefore, an owner and holder, entitled to sue and, on proper proof, entitled to recover thereon. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Schmidt, JJ.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Dawes v. McKennaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1965