Legal Opinion

Herold v. Silston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 17, 1952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The renewal note did not effect payment on the prior note, now sued upon, and the payee was, therefore, an owner and holder, entitled to sue and, on proper proof, entitled to recover thereon. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Schmidt, JJ.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dawes v. McKennaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1965