Louis v. State

The defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for sexual battery upon a *1127person younger than twelve and lewd or lascivious molestation upon a person younger than twelve. He argues, among other issues, that the trial court erred in disallowing defense counsel to cross-examine a deputy about inconsistent statements of the victims. We find no error and affirm.

On appeal, the defendant argues the trial court abused its discretion by not allowing defense counsel to question a deputy about the victims’ statements during his first interview with them. The defense sought to establish that the…