Legal Opinion · Dissent

Delaware River Basin Commission v. Bucks County Water & Sewer Authority

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 3, 1981No. 80-1662Published

1DissentBrotman, District Judge

The majority opinion is both thoughtful and scholarly. In my judgment, however, the majority ultimately arrives at an incorrect result. Therefore, I must respectfully dissent.

Initially, it is worthwhile to note that I concur with the majority in the applicability of the rational basis standard of scrutiny. The reasons underlying this deserve brief mention. First, we are concerned here with a purely economic regulation, one that has no effect on any fundamental rights. The sole question before us is who must pay the Commission for water withdrawn from the Delaware.1 Secondly, there can be no…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API