Moffit v. State

Roberts, Chief Justice.

This indictment is bad, because stating that the defendant did designedly make an obscene and indecent exhibition of his own person “ in a public place, to wit: on a public road,” as. expressed in the indictment, is not tantamount to stating that he did designedly make an obscene and indecent exhibition pf his own person “in public,” as expressed in the code. (Paschal’s Dig., art. 2030.).

The publicity contemplated in the code has reference to persons who do or can see it rather than to the place. A public road in the night-time or in a remote and unfrequented part of…