Salt Lake City v. Lee
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. M. L. Ritchie, Judge. Henry Lee was convicted in the City Court of violating an ordinance. On appeal to the District Court and on a trial de novo, he was again convicted. He appeals from the latter decision.
1Opinion of the CourtSteaup, C. J.
The defendant, in the city court, was convicted of selling adulterated milk in violation of an ordinance. He appealed to the district court. There, on a trial de novo, he again was found guilty and adjudged to pay a fine of $50. From that judgment he has appealed to this court.
A motion is made to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the judgment is nonappealable. The statute (Laws Utah 1909, c. 87), bearing on the question, reads:
“From all final judgments of a city court a motion for a new trial may be made, and an appeal may be taken by either party in a civil case, or by the defendant in a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Salt Lake City v. RobinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1912
- Salt Lake City v. RobinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1911
- Salt Lake City v. DoranUtah Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. TaylorUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Salt Lake City v. PiepenburgUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. LyteUtah Supreme Court · 1930
- State v. RobinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1969
- Logan City v. BlotterUtah Supreme Court · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.