Legal Opinion
Darold L. Rutland v. Mike Moore, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 25, 1995No. 94-60375PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:
At issue is whether, under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (ADEA), Darold L. Rut-land’s putative employment as a special assistant attorney general for the Attorney General of the State of Mississippi fell under one of the exemptions to the ADEA’s definition of “employee”, id. § 630(f), so that his termination could not be violative of the ADEA. Pursuant to the § 630(f) exemption for immediate legal advisers, we AFFIRM.
I
For the vast majority of his pre-termi-nation legal career, Rutland was an attorney for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Kelley v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Evans v. Texas Department of TransportationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2007
- Jill M. Crumpacker v. State of Kansas, Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Margolies v. DeasonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Schallop v. New York State Department of LawDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.