Legal Opinion

Woodall v. Malone-Harrison Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 11, 1929No. 4 Div. 417PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPoster, J.

Appellee sued appellants in detinue under the statute for machinery sold. Defendants suggested a mortgage as the basis of plaintiff’s claim, and pleaded specially numerous matters affecting the amount of the debt, claiming that there was nothing due on it.

The evidence tends to show that there was a mortgage given for the purchase price of the machinery, and that after it became due, a controversy arose between the parties, and they finally adjusted their differences by a compromise agreement written on the mortgage itself. In offering evidence of the amount of the indebtedness, appellee,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Frierson v. FrazierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  2. Powell v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  3. Vandegrift v. Abbott.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  4. Murphy v. FarleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  5. Thompson Foundry & Machine Co. v. GlassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Seibold v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  2. Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  3. Capmark Bank v. Rgr, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  4. Ritter v. Grady Automotive Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Mayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API