Legal Opinion
State v. Martinek
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 14, 1951PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
12 N.J. Super. 320 (1951)
79 A.2d 697
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JOSEPH MARTINEK AND WALTER MARTINEK, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 19, 1951.
Decided March 14, 1951.
Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.
Mr. Paul T. Huckin argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Francis V.D. Lloyd, attorney).
Mr. Albert S. Gross argued the cause for the defendants-appellants.
The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, J.A.D.
The defendants were convicted of the crime known as "bookmaking" in violation of R.S. 2:135-3,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. AuldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- State v. HauptmannSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- State v. MoranoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946
- State v. GuidaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- State v. GuidaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. DowneyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- State v. SchultheisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- State v. RabatinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- State v. O'SheaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- State v. OrecchioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.