Legal Opinion
Advanced Marine Technologies, Inc. v. Burnham Securities, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 7, 1998No. 97 Civ. 7004(LAK)PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KAPLAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Advanced Marine Technologies, Inc. (“AMT”) claims that defendant Burnham Securities, Inc. (“Burnham”), through its officer, A. Michael Victory, agreed to obtain financing for AMT and then failed to perform. It seeks to recover damages on theories of breach of contract, fraud, promissory estoppel, and negligence, among others. Burnham and Victory seek dismissal of the complaint on the grounds that there never was any contract between AMT and Burn- ham, that there is no basis for a fraud claim, and that the complaint fails to make out the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin EngelmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Kramer v. Time Warner Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- San Leandro Emergency Medical Group Profit Sharing Plan v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Tafari v. McCarthyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2010
- PICCOLI A/S v. Calvin Klein Jeanswear Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Rother v. NYS Department of Corrections & Community SupervisionDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
- Katz v. TravelersDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Dallio v. HebertDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.