Legal Opinion

Davis v. United States

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 1, 2002No. 01 C 6368Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ST. EVE, District Judge.

Plaintiff has moved to increase the ad damnum and the amount of damages requested in his administrative claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2675(b). (R. 6-1.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs Motion is denied.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Robert Davis a veteran who alleges that doctors and staff of the North Chicago Veterans Administration Medical Center in Cook County, Illinois (the “VA”) were negligent when they performed a transuretheral incision of the prostate procedure (“TUIP”) and a transurethral resection of the prostate procedure…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Mrs. Verdie Mae Franklin Verdie Mae Franklin, Administratrix of the Estate of Lonnie B. Franklin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. David M. Wollman v. Jake Gross, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  5. Jack Steele v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API