Legal Opinion
Griffiths v. Delaware & Hudson Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 12, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRhodes, J.
The defendant’s attorney requested the court to charge “ that no negligence can be predicated upon the failure of the train crew to see the automobile at any time before it came upon the track on which the train was running or in failing to stop the train before the auto collided with the train, no negligence on the part of the defendant can be predicated.”
The learned trial court declined “ to charge in that language.”
No negligence could be predicated upon the failure of the train crew to see the automobile at any time before it came upon the track. (Storr v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 261 N. Y.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Storr v. New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
3Cited by5 opinions
- Armondi v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Kaskoff v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Kaskoff v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Schafer v. Norwood Equipment Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950
- Veihelmann v. Manufacturers Safe Deposit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953